<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Issues: Abortion</title>
      <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/issues/abortion/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:21:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Abortion</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<strong>What does "Faithful Citizenship" say about abortion?</strong>

<blockquote>"The direct and intentional destruction of innocent human life from the moment of conception until natural death is always wrong and is not just one issue among many." #28

"The right to life implies and is linked to other human rights--to the basic goods that every human person needs to live and thrive.... The moral imperative to respond to the needs of our neighbors--basic needs such as food, shelter, health care, education, and meaningful work--is universally binding on our consciences." #25

"Our Conference supports laws and policies to protect human life to the maximum degree possible, including constitutional protection for the unborn and legislative efforts to end abortion and euthanasia. We also promote a culture of life by supporting laws and programs that encourage childbirth and adoption over abortion and by addressing poverty, providing health care, and offering other assistance to pregnant women, children, and families." #65

<em>Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship</em>, by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (November 2007)</blockquote>

For more, see <a href="http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/catholic_social_teaching/abortion/">Catholic social teaching on abortion</a>.

<strong>What does Democratic Platform say about abortion?</strong>

<blockquote>"The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v Wade and a woman's right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right. 

"The Democratic Party also strongly supports access to affordable family planning services and comprehensive age-appropriate sex education which empower people to make informed choices and live healthy lives. 

"We also recognize that such health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions. 

"The Democratic Party also strongly supports a woman's decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre and post natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs."</blockquote>

<strong>What is Barack Obama's position on abortion?</strong>
<a href="http://www.Barackobama.com" target="_blank">Barackobama.com</a>, the official site of his campaign, explains the senator's position on abortion: 

<blockquote>"Barack Obama understands that abortion is a divisive issue, and respects those who disagree with him. However, he has been a consistent champion of reproductive choice and will make preserving women's rights under Roe v. Wade a priority as President. He opposes any constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court's decision in that case.

"Barack Obama is an original co-sponsor of legislation to expand access to contraception, health information and preventive services to help reduce unintended pregnancies. Introduced in January 2007, the Prevention First Act will increase funding for family planning and comprehensive sex education that teaches both abstinence and safe sex methods. The Act will also end insurance discrimination against contraception, improve awareness about emergency contraception, and provide compassionate assistance to rape victims."</blockquote>

The site reports that he also worked to make sure that the party platform "strongly supports a woman's decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre and post natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs."

At the Saddleback Presidential Candidate Forum (August 16, 2008), in response to a question about abortion, Obama said: 
<blockquote>"I'm absolutely convinced that there is a moral and ethical element to this issue. And so I think anybody who tries to deny the moral difficulties and gravity of the abortion issue, I think, is not paying attention. So that would be point number one. 

"But point number two, I am pro-choice. I believe in Roe v. Wade, and I come to that conclusion not because I'm pro-abortion, but because, ultimately, I don't think women make these decisions casually. I think they wrestle with these things in profound ways, in consultation with their pastors or their spouses or their doctors or their family members. 

"And so, for me, the goal right now should be -- and this is where I think we can find common ground. And by the way, I've now inserted this into the Democratic Party platform, is how do we reduce the number of abortions? The fact is that although we have had a president who is opposed to abortion over the last eight years, abortions have not gone down and that is something we have to address. 

"I am in favor, for example, of limits on late-term abortions, if there is an exception for the mother's health. From the perspective of those who are pro-life, I think they would consider that inadequate, and I respect their views...

"What I can do is say, are there ways that we can work together to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, so that we actually are reducing the sense that women are seeking out abortions. And as an example of that, one of the things that I've talked about is how do we provide the resources that allow women to make the choice to keep a child. Have we given them the health care that they need? Have we given them the support services that they need? Have we given them the options of adoption that are necessary? That can make a genuine difference."</blockquote>


<a href="http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/news/2008/10/abortion_questions_and_answers.php"><strong>Please see our Q&A on abortion and Catholics, click here</strong></a>.

<!--
<strong>On life before birth</strong>

"There is something we certainly can agree on and that is to reduce the number of abortions by making sure that children are getting the kind of education they need about the sacredness of sexuality, and that we are encouraging adoptions.  There are a whole host of things we can do, and we've made progress reducing teen pregnancy and unintended pregnancy, and that's something that I think all sides can agree to."  <em>Senator Barack Obama, Interview with Christian Broadcasting Network, 11/7/07</em>

"From the specificity of the task at hand and the variety of circumstances, a plurality of morally acceptable policies and solutions arises. It is not the Church's task to set forth specific political solutions - and even less to propose a single solution as the acceptable one - to temporal questions that God has left to the free and responsible judgment of each person." - <em>Doctrinal Note on some Questions Regarding the Participation of Catholics in Political Life, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Nov 2002.</em>

"Extremely sensitive situations arise when a specifically religious norm becomes or tends to become the law of a state without due consideration for the distinction between the domains proper to religion and to political society. In practice, the identification of religious law with civil law can stifle religious freedom, even going so far as to restrict or deny other inalienable human rights." - <em>John Paul II, Message for the World Day of Peace, 1 Jan 1991</em>


<strong>Taking a position on abortion</strong>

Perhaps Governor Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, has said it best in his speeches to audiences across the country: "I don't know anyone who is pro-abortion." Virtually every Democrat in public life believes that we should be working together to significantly cut the number of abortions performed in the United States. In fact, it is not widely appreciated that <strong>significant progress was made under President Bill Clinton's Administration: the number of abortions fell from more than 1.6 million each year during the first Bush Administration to under 1.3 million now</strong>. Like our Bishops, we feel that people across the political spectrum should be working hard to support women and to help bring every baby into the world. Pregnancy and parenthood are no cake walk, and the real question is whether we as a society value women and the extraordinary sacrifices that motherhood requires.

To this end, we have advocated across the country for a platform of positive measures that could further impact this significant problem. <a href="http://www.democratsforlife.org/" target="_blank">Democrats for Life</a> have made an important contribution with their legislative initiative to actually do something to help women avoid going through this ordeal. For more information on adoption options, we can strongly recommend a website created by a Catholic couple, Paulette and Jim Joyce in Pittsburgh, called <a href="http://www.chooseadoption.net/" target="_blank">ChooseAdoption.net</a>.


<a href="http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/news/2005/08/100_abortion_in_the_narrow_vie.php"><strong>Justice Sunday II: It's all Roe v Wade, all-the-time, for the Heritage Foundation's man at the Catholic League</strong></a>


<a href="http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/news/2005/08/a_prolife_catholic_says_democr.php"><strong>Catholic Democrats of Nebraska: A pro-life Catholic says Democrats are a better fit (Dan Schinzel, Omaha World-Herald, 8/16/05)</strong></a>


<strong>Facts regarding the Bush position on abortion:</strong>

1. Mr. Bush has never publicly advocated the illegality of abortion. He was asked directly in the third Presidential Debate (10/13/04 in Arizona) if he would like to overturn Roe vs. Wade. He declined to answer this question, saying only that he would not use a litmus test in selecting judges.

2. His public position may be best characterized by his statement in the third debate: "Surely there are ways we can work together to reduce the number of abortions: continue to promote adoption laws - that's a great alternative to abortion. Continue to fund and promote maternity group homes. I will continue to promote abstinence programs." Then he concluded, "All of us ought to be involved with programs that provide a viable alternative to abortion." This stance is indistinguishable from those of his opponent at the time, Senator John Kerry, or the presumptive 2008 Democratic nominee, Senator Barack Obama.

3. The "Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003" passed by Congress and signed by Mr. Bush in November that year indicates that this undefined procedure affects fewer than 0.2% of all abortions. Implicitly acknowledged is the fact that this law has not had any effect on the number of abortions performed in the United States (since the other, more prevalent method, has simply replaced it). Consequently, Mr. Bush erred when he stated in the third Presidential debate, ""I believe reasonable people can come together and put good law in place that will help reduce the number of abortions. Take, for example, the ban on partial-birth abortion." The "partial birth abortion ban" represents a political ploy intended to label Democrats in a negative way, and has nothing to do with efforts to decrease the number of abortions in the US. Click <a href="http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/abortion/2003s3.html" target="_blank">here</a> for more details.

4. The "Unborn Victims of Violence Act" signed into law in April 2004 was cited by Mr. Bush in the second presidential debate as a measure that would decrease the number of abortions. However, the law makes no reference to abortion, and has not been construed as a measure that restricts abortion. The law relates only to a narrow set of circumstances in which a pregnant woman is injured, for instance during a federal crime such as a terrorist attack or drug-related shooting, or for crimes committed on military bases or federal lands.

5. The Republican Platform for 2004 called for a Constitutional amendment banning abortion. But the advocacy of illegality alone does nothing to decrease abortion. For example, as noted above, during the Reagan Administration the number of abortions rose significantly and peaked during the first Bush Administration. In contrast, during the Clinton Administration the number of abortions fell significantly, and were performed at a significantly earlier stage in pregnancy. <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5309a1.htm" target="_blank">CDC data on abortion in 2001</a> shows that abortions have not decreased in number during the current Bush Administration. In fact, rates of teenage abortions rose in the first year of the Bush Administration for the first time in many years.

6. From a practical standpoint, outlawing abortion would result in changing a surgical procedure that is safe for the mother into an illicit drug problem with a predictable and substantial incidence of birth defects and potential maternal death. Misoprostol is widely available in other countries, costs pennies to make, and potentially could be sold for hundreds of dollars if the substance was illegal. 8% of misoprostol treatments fail to induce abortion, and have a relatively high incidence of induced birth defects.

7.  In October 2007, President Bush vetoed Democratic abortion reduction legislation, along with the Health & Human Services appropriation bill.  This law, authored by Reps Tim Ryan and Rosa DeLauro, had the potential to significantly reduce the number of abortions in the US.  Mr Bush's veto was sustained by many of his Republican colleagues, including Senator John McCain, further indicating that their interest in abortion is purely political and has little to do with concern for bringing babies to term.


<strong>Moral scorecard:</strong>

 1. The Bush Administration has done nothing to decrease the number of abortions in the United States. This is borne out by limited data from the CDC that show the abortion rate in the US plateauing for the first time since 1989. Although the Administration has substantially increased funding for "abstinence-only sex education" and a variety of church-sponsored "crisis pregnancy centers," they have expressed no interest in objectively studying what (if any) effect these expenditures have on rates of abortion. Furthermore, Bush vetoed the first substantial abortion reduction legislation (sponsored by Democrats) in October 2007.

2. Bush Administration social policy has led to increases in joblessness for the first time since the Hoover Administration, in a loss of disposable income for families, and in a substantial increase in the number of women without health insurance. In the limited data available, all these factors have been identified as potential contributors to the number of abortions in the United States.

3. Although Mr. Bush has not publicly advocated the illegality of abortion, confining one's abortion opposition to advocacy for illegality is an excuse to do practically nothing to stop abortions anytime in the next 50 years.

4. Many "pro-life" advocates are fond of using the term "murder" when referring to abortion. Even so, most of them recoil at the prospect of actually punishing pregnant women, and indeed few women in American history have been directly punished for seeking abortions. Perhaps these advocates recognize subconsciously that imprisonment could never be considered the Catholic solution to any moral problem. The opportunity costs of imprisoning hundreds of thousands of pregnant women would mean tens of billions of dollars in costs to state and local governments that would not otherwise go to healthcare, homecare for the elderly, and education.

5. Practically speaking, no one can predict that abortion will ever become illegal in the United States, even were Roe v. Wade to be overturned. But those states that sought to make it illegal would likely convert abortion into an illicit drug problem, causing maternal death and substantial levels of misoprostol-related birth defects. With 40% of American teenagers having acknowledged marijuana use, the Federal Government has an awful track record in limiting the use of illicit drugs. The government's ability to limit illegal abortion is likely to be similarly (and severely) limited.

6. Since any illegality for abortion in the future would mean dealing with a new illicit drug problem, there won't be many doctors to hold accountable. Who will be punished under such an illegality scheme in states like Mississippi? Half of all women seeking abortions have other children who would be forced into foster or relative care if their mothers were the only ones available to hold accountable. Advocates of illegality must explain how these fully foreseen consequences would be compatible with the compassion implicit in the Catholic world view.

7. Mr. Bush stated at the signing ceremony for the "Unborn Victims of Violence Act" that, "The moral concern of humanity extends to those unborn children who are harmed or killed in crimes against their mothers. And now, the protection of federal law extends to those children, as well." He has however expressed no remorse for, or even awareness of, all those women and unborn babies who have been killed as a result of his policies in Iraq.

-->]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/issues/abortion/2007/02/on_abortion.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/issues/abortion/2007/02/on_abortion.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:21:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
