<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Catholic Democrats of New York</title>
      <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:16:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>The Latino impact on Catholic New York</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Many people, if asked when Hispanics began to reshape the Catholic Church in New York City, would probably put the date around 1950, when Puerto Rican migrants began arriving in Manhattan in large numbers. But in fact, Hispanics had exerted a powerful influence on religion and society in New York more than a century earlier, an important insight that emerged from a panel discussion on Tuesday night at the Museum of the City of New York.

The panel discussion -- part of an exhibition, "Catholics in New York, 1808-1946," that is on view through Dec. 31 -- was billed as a talk on Latinos and the future of Catholic New York. The most informative parts of the 90-minute discussion focused on little-known aspects of social, religious and urban history. Rafael Pi Roman, the host of WNET's "New York Voices," moderated the discussion. 

For <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/hispanics-and-catholic-new-york/index.html?hp">full article in the TIMES</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/07/the_latino_impact_on_catholic.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/07/the_latino_impact_on_catholic.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:16:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>WSJ: Obama, Religion and the Public Square</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Barack Obama is no John Kennedy. And that may turn out to be a good thing. At least with regard to reversing one of the unintended consequences of Camelot: the idea that religious voices have no place on the public square.

At first blush, Sen. Obama may appear to be an odd choice to lead such a reversal. Until very recently, he worshipped at a church whose preachers apparently regard America as something to be abhorred – and have a distressing penchant for being filmed while they do so. Earlier in the primaries, Mr. Obama took flak for his own comments describing small-town Pennsylvania as a place populated by those who "cling to" religion because they are "bitter." And Mr. Obama's positions on hot-button issues like abortion – as a member of the Illinois Senate, he voted against legislation protecting a child who was born alive despite an abortion – put him at odds with many of those thought to represent the religious vote.

Yet there is more to Mr. Obama and religion than the recent headlines might suggest. Nowhere is that more clear than in the thoughtful address he delivered two years ago to a Sojourners/Call to Renewal conference. In that speech, the senator made clear his distance from religious conservatives, and called for an end to faith "as a tool of attack." Yet the thrust of his remarks was directed squarely at liberal Democrats. Their discomfort with all things religious, he said, runs against American history, and robs progressives of the ability to speak to their fellow citizens in moral terms.

See full article:
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB121305280815658925.html">Obama, Religion and the Public Square
by William McGurn
June 10, 2008; Page A15</a>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/06/wsj_obama_religion_and_the_pub.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/06/wsj_obama_religion_and_the_pub.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:28:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Catholics in New York 1808-1946, at the Museum of the City of New York</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This new exhibit shows a rich collection of political and ecclesial memorabilia with colorful stories to match.  It’s bracing to witness the depth of suspicion and outright hostility that Catholics originally faced here. In the 19th century, the exhibition reminds us, Catholics in New York were so ostracized that they had no choice but to found their own institutions -- from schools to political structures -- simply to maintain a foothold in the emerging metropolis. 

See full article:
<a href="http://www.irishabroad.com/news/irish-voice/entertainment/Articles/catholics-newyork040608.aspx">Irish Voice: Catholics in NY examined
June 6, 2008 
by Cahir O’Doherty </a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/06/catholics_in_new_york_18081946.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/06/catholics_in_new_york_18081946.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:49:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Number of uninsured young people climbing</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Sara Collins PhD of the New York-based Commonwealth Fund issued a new report indicating that 30% of people between 19-29 have no health insurance, compared with 12% of children.  The number of uninsured young people jumped 3% from 2005 to 2006, to 13.7 million.  The statistics were particularly striking for individual communities, with 36% of black young Americans lacking insurance and 53% of Latinos.

<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2928542520080530?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews&sp=true">Read more</a> in a report from Reuters.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/05/number_of_uninsured_young_peop.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/05/number_of_uninsured_young_peop.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 02:53:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Rep Slaughter&apos;s genetic non-discrimination bill awaits presidential signature</title>
         <description>A spokesperson for the US Bishops&apos; Conference praised the passage of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (H.R. 493), which passed unanimously in the Senate on April 24 and subsequently with only one nay vote in the House.  The bill, initially authored by Rep Louise Slaughter (D-NY), bars employers and health insurers from discriminating against individuals on the basis of their own or their family&apos;s genetic information. 

Deirdre McQuade, Assistant Director for Policy and Communications at the USCCB Secretariat of Pro-life Activities, said, &quot;Today the Senate took a stand for some of the most vulnerable members of the human family, whether born, yet to be born, or placed for adoption. No one should be discriminated against on the basis of genetic testing.&quot;
</description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/05/rep_slaughters_genetic_nondisc.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/05/rep_slaughters_genetic_nondisc.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:10:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>About New York: Catholic Vote Is Harbinger of Success for Clinton</title>
         <description>February 9, 2008--Hillary Rodham Clinton has run away with the votes of Roman Catholic Democrats in nearly all the primaries, often beating Barack Obama by two to one or better, exit polls show. In New York, she received 66 percent of the Catholic vote to his 30 percent. 

&quot;I didn&apos;t go to bed until 1 in the morning waiting on the results,&quot; said Joe Quinn, a Catholic who is a building superintendent on the Upper West Side. &quot;I slept very well, let me tell you.&quot;

Does it matter whom Catholics like Mr. Quinn voted for in the Democratic primaries? By November, it may not. Still, Catholics, who make up about a quarter of the registered voters in the country, have backed the winner of the national popular vote for at least the last nine presidential elections, going back to 1972. 

The Catholic scorecard: five Republican and three Democratic presidents, and one popular-vote-winning but presidency-losing Democrat, Al Gore. 

No other large group has switched sides so often, or been so consistently aligned with the winners. Over that same period, a majority of white Protestants typically voted Republican, while blacks of all faiths and Jews strongly backed Democrats.

&quot;Catholics are the last swing voters left in the country,&quot; said Brian O&apos;Dwyer, a Manhattan lawyer and a Clinton supporter. 

So why Mrs. Clinton? Catholics are scattered across the American landscape, with the sun having long set on the empire of the parish, a source of boundary and social identity. No single explanation for Mrs. Clinton&apos;s current success could credibly cover enough ground. That did not stop New Yorkers from trying. 

Mr. O&apos;Dwyer maintains that Mrs. Clinton as a senator--and Bill Clinton, as president--paid attention to ethnic and working-class Catholics who were often overlooked by both parties. &quot;Every one of the ethnic groups got a hearing,&quot; he said, making them comfortable with Mrs. Clinton&apos;s position on Social Security, health care, education and immigration. And both Clintons, he said, had played central roles in brokering an end to the armed conflict in Northern Ireland. 

Another, more daring idea is that Mrs. Clinton owes some of her success to the nuns who were once a potent presence in American Catholicism. 

This notion was floated by Catherine T. Nolan, who attended St. Aloysius elementary school in Queens and now represents her old neighborhood in the State Assembly. She noted that older Catholic voters grew up with women in charge of daily life. 

&quot;Maybe we&apos;re a little bit more open to female leadership,&quot; said Ms. Nolan, chairwoman of the Assembly Education Committee, one of the most powerful legislative posts in Albany. &quot;We had female role models from an early age. When I was growing up, all the Catholic school principals were women, and almost none of the public school principals were. That&apos;s changed now, but we&apos;ve been used to female authority figures for much longer than other groups.&quot;

Wait a minute: feminism in a religion with an all-male priesthood? &quot;As a young girl, I never thought about who was up on the altar,&quot; Ms. Nolan said. &quot;The nuns were the people we saw every day, and they were running the whole show.&quot;

The nuns, however, cannot account for all of Mrs. Clinton’s success. &quot;She is putting more interest into the Latino communities,&quot; said Gina Trifolio, 26, of Washington Heights. &quot;And, of course, she is a woman.&quot;

As with other groups, younger and more affluent Catholics were more likely to back Mr. Obama. So were people who just don&apos;t like Mrs. Clinton. 

&quot;I voted for Obama, but it was mostly an anti-Hillary vote,&quot; said Bill Duffy, a police officer who was picking up his children from a parochial school in the northwest Bronx. &quot;I mean, Obama&apos;s got some good things about him, but the experience is a question. So I might end up with McCain.&quot;

Ms. Nolan recalled, as a girl, going on a field trip in Upper Manhattan to the shrine of Mother Frances Xavier Cabrini--an immigrant nun from Italy who in the late 19th century built 67 orphanages, hospitals and schools, amassing and wielding power against a stubborn hierarchy. She was the first American to be canonized a saint. 

The destination was the shrine where an effigy of the saint, along with some of her remains, are displayed under glass beneath the altar. &quot;When you&apos;re a fourth grader coming from Queens and you see that--well, you talk about female role models,&quot; Ms. Nolan said. &quot;Not that I&apos;m putting Hillary Clinton in that category.&quot;

Marjorie Connelly contributed research. 
Written by JIM DWYER, Copyright 2008, NY Times
E-mail:dwyer@nytimes.com</description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/02/about_new_york_catholic_vote_i.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2008/02/about_new_york_catholic_vote_i.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:24:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Spotlight On: Representative Kristen Gillibrand</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Representative Gillibrand is serving her first term as U.S. Representative to New York's Twentieth Congressional District, which stretches across Saratoga, Dutchess, Columbia, Rensselaer, Washington, Warren, Delaware, Greene, Essex and Otsego Counties.  She serves on the House Armed Services Committee and the Agriculture Committee.  

Representative Gillibrand has already introduced and sponsored several pieces of legislation, which regard the least among us.  She introduced the Family Care Act of 2007, which sought to amend the Internal Revenue Code to increase tax cuts for those living with dependents.  

Learn more: <a href="http://gillibrand.house.gov/">http://gillibrand.house.gov/</a>

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2007/11/spotlight_on_representative_kr.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2007/11/spotlight_on_representative_kr.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:12:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>News from the NY Catholic Conference</title>
         <description><![CDATA[On August 1, 2007 Governor Eliot Spitzer signed into law a piece of legislation strongly supported by the New York State Catholic Conference that will promote the donation, collection, preservation and storage of umbilical cord blood for research and treatment.  The bill was originally drafted by the Catholic Conference in 2004 and unanimously passed both the Senate and Assembly.  A statement on the enactment of the law by Conference Director of Pro-Life Activities Kathleen M. Gallagher is below.  Read more <a href="http://www.nyscatholicconference.org/pages/news/show_newsDetails.asp?id=333&cat=News%20Releases">here</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2007/11/news_from_the_ny_catholic_conf.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/NY/2007/11/news_from_the_ny_catholic_conf.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:11:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
