<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Catholic Democrats of DC</title>
      <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:05:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Judge repudiates Bush on endless imprisonment at Guantanamo</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Washington--Oct 7--A federal judge ordered the Bush administration yesterday to immediately release 17 Chinese Muslims and allow them to stay in the United States, ruling that they are no longer considered enemy combatants. Federal District Judge Ricardo Urbina called the detention at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, of the 17 prisoners - ethnic Uighurs, a restive Muslim minority in western China - unlawful, saying the Constitution prohibits indefinite imprisonment without charges.

Jesus commanded compassion for prisoners, and this action represents a thorough repudiation of the idea that foreigners can be abused like this with deprivation of international standards of human rights.

<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2008/10/08/judge_orders_17_freed_from_guantanamo/" target="_new">Click here for full article.</a>

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/10/judge_repudiates_bush_on_endle.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/10/judge_repudiates_bush_on_endle.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:05:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pondering its own criminality, White House under pressure to give &apos;pre-emptive pardons&apos; to Bush officials</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The New York Times reported 7/19/08 that the Administration was under pressure from some conservatives to offer "pre-emptive pardons" to their own officials, in case an Obama Administration chose to hold them accountable for their actions related to torture, unlawful spying on Americans, destruction of White House emails, and an array of other matters.

<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/19/us/19pardon.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=pre-emptive%20pardons&st=cse&oref=slogin" target="_new">Felons Seeking Bush Pardons Approach Record</a>
by Charlie Savage, NY Times, Sat 19 Jul 2008 

...As the administration wrestles with the cascade of petitions, some lawyers and law professors are raising a related question: Will Mr. Bush grant pre-emptive pardons to officials involved in controversial counterterrorism programs?

    Such a pardon would reduce the risk that a future administration might undertake a criminal investigation of operatives or policy makers involved in programs that administration lawyers have said were legal but that critics say violated laws regarding torture and surveillance.

    Some legal analysts said Mr. Bush might be reluctant to issue such pardons because they could be construed as an implicit admission of guilt. But several members of the conservative legal community in Washington said in interviews that they hoped Mr. Bush would issue such pardons - whether or not anyone made a specific request for one. They said people who carried out the president's orders should not be exposed even to the risk of an investigation and expensive legal bills.

    "The president should pre-empt any long-term investigations," said Victoria Toensing, who was a Justice Department counterterrorism official in the Reagan administration. "If we don't protect these people who are proceeding in good faith, no one will ever take chances."

    Emily Lawrimore, a White House spokeswoman, would not say whether the administration was considering pre-emptive pardons, nor whether it would rule them out.

    "We are going to decline to comment on that question since it is regarding internal matters," Ms. Lawrimore wrote in an e-mail message.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/07/pondering_its_own_criminality.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/07/pondering_its_own_criminality.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:23:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Once again, four Catholic Justices vote for death</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Four of the five Catholic Supreme Court Justices banded together again to endorse state-sponsored killing in cases of sexual assault on children.  As heinous as such an act is, implementation of the death penalty was found by the five-judge majority to constitute cruel and unusual punishment.  The essentially vindictive nature of the death penalty has led Catholic bishops worldwide to condemn use of the death penalty in any circumstances.  

But Scalia, Roberts, Alito and Thomas have chosen once again to side with the punishmentalists, having voted only weeks earlier to allow reinstatement of lethal injection nationwide.  Coupled with their support for indefinite detention of foreigners, this quartet of conservative justices seem bound by a peculiar dissenting form of Catholicism.

<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/26/washington/26scotuscnd.html?hp" target="_new">Full article</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/06/once_again_four_catholic_justi.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/06/once_again_four_catholic_justi.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:28:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Tony Blair on climate change legislation finally gaining momentum</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The climate change bill that senators are to begin debating next week is a hugely important signal of intent on behalf of U.S. legislators. Yes, negotiations could still alter the legislation. But the bill's core proposition is correct: Unless the United States radically reduces its greenhouse gas emissions, along with other major emitters, the damage to the climate will be irreversible.

Radical reduction is unlikely to happen through voluntary action alone. Measures in the bill, through a mandatory cap-and-trade scheme, would reduce emissions 70 percent from 2005 levels by 2050. These cuts would be based on a carbon market incentive system that moves with the grain of action around the globe.

Over the past few years, the debate on climate change has shifted profoundly. The scientific consensus that human activity is causing global warming has become overwhelming. The effect of unabated climate change is shocking and, as was shown by the report of Sir Nicholas Stern -- the first authoritative study of the economics of climate change, commissioned by the British government in 2006 -- it is far riskier economically to ignore climate change than to act to abate it.

For full essay: 
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/28/AR2008052802915_pf.html" target="_new">Leading On Climate Change
How Action in Congress Can Move the World</a>
By Tony Blair
Washington Post
Thursday, May 29, 2008; A19

<em>The writer was British prime minister from 1997 to 2007. He recently launched the Breaking the Climate Deadlock initiative to promote a new global agreement on climate change.</em>

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/05/climate_change_legislation_fin.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/05/climate_change_legislation_fin.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:41:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Administration still committed to engaging in torture by CIA</title>
         <description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON (Apr 27)--The Justice Department has told Congress that American intelligence operatives attempting to thwart terrorist attacks can legally use interrogation methods that might otherwise be prohibited under international law. The legal interpretation, outlined in recent letters, sheds new light on the still-secret rules for interrogations by the Central Intelligence Agency. It shows that the administration is arguing that the boundaries for interrogations should be subject to some latitude, even under an executive order issued last summer that President Bush said meant that the C.I.A. would comply with international strictures against harsh treatment of detainees. The total hypocrisy of an Administration that holds Bible studies and touts its Christian <em>bona fides</em>, while still providing for torture of bound subjects, is breathtaking.  The overwhelming opinion of former intelligence officers is that torture produces bad information, and gives the country's enemies a propaganda victory like no other.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/washington/27intel.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1209302698-CYlMQuEF0h8AiKPxsf0YZw" target="_new">Read more.</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/04/administration_still_committed.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/04/administration_still_committed.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:27:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Local Issues in Advance of Tuesday&apos;s Primary</title>
         <description><![CDATA[With national attention focused on the District, Maryland, and Virginia, it's exciting to be at the center of perhaps the most contentious nominating contest in recent history, but it's also easy to forget what the election in November could mean for the thousands of District residents that face a troubling set of core challenges:

- A Democrat in the White House will absolutely bring us as close as we've ever been to enfranchising the hundreds of thousands of DC residents who are the only American citizens in contiguous United States who are denied voting representation in congress! 

 - It's no secret that the educational system in DC is badly broken. Mayor Fenty and Chancellor Rhee are certainly off to a fervent start in repairing the system, but we can't forget that electing a president who cares about education puts a powerful advocate in our back yard (and of course, we care about educational equity for all Americans, beyond our borders). To put into perspective how stark our educational crisis is, consider this: <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=d8nvbuv81&show_article=1" target="_new">over one-third of District residents are functionally illiterate, compared with only one-fifth nationally.</a>

- We need careful and fair development of the city, a strategy that celebrates the rich cultural and political heritage of DC's many neighborhoods, and that emphasizes the value of community and the need for affordable housing as we support economic redevelopment and opportunity.  

- Perhaps the healthcare crisis is nowhere more dire than in the nation's capital, where residents face the nation's highest HIV/AIDS rate and face significant obstacles to receiving even basic preventative care, prenatal care, dental care, and urgent care services. Consider that, save for overburdened hospital emergency rooms, there are <b>no urgent care facilities open in DC on the weekend.</b>

- Even our drinking water is in peril. The Washington Post reported in the summer of last year that <a href="http:/http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/071007HA.shtml/" target="_new">lead exposure leads to violent crime.</a> The District has been battling lead in our drinking water for decades, and unfortunately, lead exposure is a better indicator of crime than almost any other suggested causes of crime. 

Let's be sure to keep local issues alive this week and on through November, because the District must be a model of the transformative power of good government, right here at the seat of federal power. We need to bring a Democrat back to Pennsylvania Avenue - for the international community, the country, and our city. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/02/local_issues_in_advance_of_tue.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/02/local_issues_in_advance_of_tue.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:46:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Full itinerary for Pope&apos;s visit to US released</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Washington DC, Feb 1, 2008 / 01:05 am (CNA).- Pope Benedict XVI's itinerary for his first papal visit to the United States has been released and includes a wide range of events. The Holy Father will visit with the President, meet with 350 bishops from around the U.S. and address Catholic educators among other commitments.

The Pope will arrive in Washington on Tuesday, April 15.  Upon arrival he will meet with President George W. Bush and First Lady Laura Bush, and the next day he will visit the White House.

On April 16, Pope Benedict will also hold a prayer service and meeting with the 350 bishops of the United States at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception.

Thursday morning, the Pope will celebrate Mass at the Nationals Park in Washington, the first non-baseball event in the park.  Later that day, he will visit Catholic University of America to deliver an address both to the heads of more than 200 Catholic colleges and universities and to school superintendents from 195 Catholic dioceses.

After the address to educators, the Pope will meet with Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus, and representatives of other religions for a prayer service at the Pope John Paul II Cultural Center near Catholic University.

Pope Benedict will leave for New York City on the morning of April 18.  He will address the United Nations at 10:45 a.m. and at 6 p.m. he will hold a prayer service at St. Joseph's Church in Manhattan.

The next day, the Pope will hold a 9:15 a.m. Mass for priests and deacons at St. Patrick's Cathedral.  He will meet with Catholic youth, including 50 disabled children, at St. Joseph's Seminary in Yonkers.

On the morning of April 20 the Pope will visit ground zero, the site of the destroyed World Trade Center buildings.  Following the Ground Zero stop, he will celebrate a Mass with 60,000 people in Yankee Stadium at 2:30, and will leave New York for Rome at 8 pm.

The Archdiocese of Boston is making available 3,000 tickets for Boston-area Catholics who want to attend the papal Mass at Yankee Stadium in New York on April 20, according to the Boston Globe.

The Boston tickets can be requested online at <a href="http://boston200.org " target="_new">boston200.org </a>and are available only to registered parishioners over the age of 14.  If more than 3,000 people request tickets, they will be chosen by lottery.

"Many Catholics have called asking if the archdiocese would have tickets, so we requested a number from the Archdiocese of New York, and we were thrilled that they allocated such a large number for us," said Scot Landry, coordinator of the event. "There's a natural affection for the Holy Father, and this is his first trip to the US, and I think people want to experience it firsthand."

At the New York Mass, the Pope will recognize the bicentennial of the Archdiocese of Baltimore and the creation of the dioceses of Boston, New York, Louisville, and Philadelphia.

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has set up a website for the papal visit, located at <a href="http://www.uspapalvisit.org" target="_new">www.uspapalvisit.org</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/02/full_itinerary_for_popes_visit.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/DC/2008/02/full_itinerary_for_popes_visit.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:00:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
